You asked
How do I play?
Answered counted as answeredAsked with: Jump Drivebg-205597-en-1e
One rule clearer, zero feelings hurt.
🔧 debug — where this ruling came from
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- corpus profile
- live,vps
- answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only)
- gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70
- timings
- search 155 ms · ask 3769 ms · total 3926 ms
- single-flight (PR-5)
- queued 0 ms · generation 3926 ms
- retrieval refs (raw) — what the PASSAGE SEARCH returned, not what the answerer read
- [{"page": 1, "score": 0.048916, "snippet": "by Tom Lehmann Develop technologies and settle worlds to build a space empire. Find winning card combinations! This fast paced game introduces players to the Race for the Galaxy universe. Players place cards to build their empires, discarding other cards to pay for them. Cards placed score every rou", "headingPath": "SETUP · PLAY", "sharpsignalDocId": 1101}, {"page": 1, "score": 0.047619, "snippet": "Each card lists its type, cost or defense, VPs, income, possibly a power, as well as up to three icons: either explore , military , or chromosome . Explore icons affect the Explore action. Military is used to conquer military worlds. All icons also affect various cards' powers, VPs, or income. Power", "headingPath": "CARDS · PAYMENTS / CONQUEST · PLACING A SECOND WORLD", "sharpsignalDocId": 1101}, {"page": 2, "score": 0.046696, "snippet": "Design and rules: Tom Lehmann Illustrations: Martin Hoffmann and Claus Stephan Graphics: Mirko Suzuki Original icons: Wei-Hwa Huang may discard from empire to place a second at -2 cost; both worlds must be non-military COLONY CONVOY may place a second military with your unused MILITARY CONVOY An Exp", "headingPath": "CREDITS · Fine Points", "sharpsignalDocId": 1101}, {"page": 2, "score": 0.032258, "snippet": "Collect VPs for every card in your empire as shown on the card. Some cards produce varying VPs or income for certain icons or card types in your empire (see right). Duplicate cards do this multiple times. Some cards produce VPs for certain icons or card types in your empire and in one other player's", "headingPath": "SCORE VPs AND COLLECT INCOME", "sharpsignalDocId": 1101}, {"page": 2, "score": 0.03125, "snippet": "Second worlds are placed after revealing cards and paying for or conquering them (but before scoring). If a player drew a card for not placing a development, this card could be placed as a second world. A Colony Convoy is discarded when used. It may be used on a later round than the one in which it ", "headingPath": "PLACING A SECOND WORLD · EXPLORE", "sharpsignalDocId": 1101}, {"page": 2, "score": 0.030769, "snippet": "Round 2: Joe places Consumer Markets , discarding just 1 card for it (not 2), as he did not place a world this turn. He earns 1 VP this round and his income increases to 3. He ends with 6 cards in hand. Round 3: Joe reveals Survey HQ , discarding 4 cards for it. Since Joe did not place a development", "headingPath": "SAMPLE TURNS", "sharpsignalDocId": 1101}]
- citations (raw) — what the answer cited, chosen from a retrieval this page cannot show
- [{"page": 1, "quote": null, "headingPath": "SETUP · PLAY", "sharpsignalDocId": 1101}, {"page": 1, "quote": null, "headingPath": "CARDS · PAYMENTS / CONQUEST · PLACING A SECOND WORLD", "sharpsignalDocId": 1101}, {"page": 2, "quote": null, "headingPath": "PLACING A SECOND WORLD · EXPLORE", "sharpsignalDocId": 1101}, {"page": 2, "quote": null, "headingPath": "SCORE VPs AND COLLECT INCOME", "sharpsignalDocId": 1101}]
- boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3)
-
no registered errata card matched this query; base rulebook doc 1101 boosted; rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true
base rulebook doc 1101 boosted
- answered-before recall
-
this ruling was answered, so past rulings were not offered
similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)
- answer fence
- passed — letter density 0.88491 of 1842 non-space chars (floor 0.45); 0 glyph-index tokens (max 2)
- debug row recorded
- Sep 5, 2026 15:42 UTC
retrieval — what the passage search returned
what this block IS: the PASSAGE SEARCH's own results — the same search that fills this page's closest-passages list — and NOT the passages the answerer read. Answering runs its OWN retrieval: a far wider candidate pool, re-ranked down to a final handful, plus floors this search never applies — the base rulebook, surviving errata corrections, and one slot per book on a multi-book read. Each of those armed only if THIS ask sent what it needs: the boost block names the ids it forwarded, and the scope line names the books it read. A document the answer CITES that no row here names is therefore EXPECTED, not a defect: two searches, two candidate pools, two orders. The answerer's own final rows are shown in their own block below, beside these and never mixed into them.
score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. This ruling ran the THREE-ARM fuse (full-text + vector + the doc-priority boost arm, which carried the base rulebook and/or the errata corrections this query matched), whose arithmetic ceiling is 0.04918 — all three arms ranking the same chunk #1 (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60). The measured healthy band 0.016–0.033 was measured on TWO-arm asks and does not bound this one: its high end is the two-arm ceiling, and a third arm has room above it. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.
per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| fused rank | document | heading | page | fused RRF score | snippet chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | SETUP · PLAY | p.1 | 0.048916 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | CARDS · PAYMENTS / CONQUEST · PLACING A SECOND WORLD | p.1 | 0.047619 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | CREDITS · Fine Points | p.2 | 0.046696 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | SCORE VPs AND COLLECT INCOME | p.2 | 0.032258 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | PLACING A SECOND WORLD · EXPLORE | p.2 | 0.03125 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #6 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | SAMPLE TURNS | p.2 | 0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
what the answerer read — the passages it actually had in front of it
what this block IS: the passages the ANSWERING read put in front of the answerer, in the order it read them — the other half of the two reads described above, and the one that decides what the answer could possibly say. Each row names the book it came from and where in that book it sits, what it scored when the search arms were fused, which arm carried it there, and whether the re-ranker chose it or a floor guaranteed it a slot. A row here that no passage-search row names is EXPECTED: a far wider pool, re-ranked, with floors the passage search never applies.
candidate pool: the answering read scored 6 passages, out of a ceiling of 80 set gateway-side. Both figures are reported by the gateway for THIS ask — measurements of what actually happened, not constants read out of anyone's source and printed here on faith.
floors armed for this ask: the base rulebook — armed · surviving errata corrections — not armed · one slot per book on a multi-book read — not armed. Every floor is stated on every ask, armed or not, so a floor that did not apply here is never mistaken for one this app does not know about.
arms fused for this ask: vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm. Stated separately from the rows because an arm that ran and carried nothing is a different fact from an arm that never ran.
| read at | document | heading | page | fused rank | fused RRF score | carried by | how it got its slot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | SETUP · PLAY | p.1 | #1 | 0.048916 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | SCORE VPs AND COLLECT INCOME | p.2 | #4 | 0.032258 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | CREDITS · Fine Points | p.2 | #3 | 0.046696 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | SAMPLE TURNS | p.2 | #6 | 0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | CARDS · PAYMENTS / CONQUEST · PLACING A SECOND WORLD | p.1 | #2 | 0.047619 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #6 | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | PLACING A SECOND WORLD · EXPLORE | p.2 | #5 | 0.03125 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
chosen chunks — what the answer actually cited
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| # | document | heading | page | quote chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | SETUP · PLAY | p.1 | no quote on the wire |
| [2] | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | CARDS · PAYMENTS / CONQUEST · PLACING A SECOND WORLD | p.1 | no quote on the wire |
| [3] | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | PLACING A SECOND WORLD · EXPLORE | p.2 | no quote on the wire |
| [4] | RULEBOOK Jump Drive — Rulebook (corpus doc 1101) | SCORE VPs AND COLLECT INCOME | p.2 | no quote on the wire |
generation — timing and the path taken
- timing split
- retrieval 155 ms · first delta 913 ms · total 3926 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
- full breakdown
- queued 0 ms · retrieval 155 ms · ask 3769 ms · gateway work 3926 ms · total 3926 ms
- tokens in (the prompt the answerer read)
- 2635
- tokens out (what the answerer generated)
- 587
- tok/sec
- 201.4 tok/sec — 587 output tokens in 2.914 s of generation
- live seat (read from the running child)
- answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 11s ago)
- answerer host (measured by rulesage)
- reachable (for 22h, checked 0s ago)
- answerer node (the seat proxy's own header — this probe, not this ask)
- node1
- stream path
- streamed — the gateway pushed at least one accumulated draft
- watchdog
- first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
- num_ctx · think posture
- both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.
disposition
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- abstain rationale (n/a — this ruling answered)
- answered — no abstain rationale applies
setup-shape — why the checklist band did or didn't render
- decision
- NOT_SETUP_SHAPED — no setup-shape pattern matched this question
errata registry — what the gate above had to match against
this game registers NO errata cards (edition 1031), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one
Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.