You asked
How do I play?
Answered counted as answeredAsked with: Rebel Princessbg-381249-en-1e
Rule found, game on.
🔧 debug — where this ruling came from
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- corpus profile
- live,vps
- answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only)
- gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70
- timings
- search 84 ms · ask 4025 ms · total 4111 ms
- single-flight (PR-5)
- queued 0 ms · generation 4111 ms
- retrieval refs (raw) — what the PASSAGE SEARCH returned, not what the answerer read
- [{"page": 6, "score": 0.048916, "snippet": "For each trick, each player, starting with the starting player and proceeding clockwise , must play one card face up in plain sight. The first card played will be the leading suit and the other play -ers must follow it , i.e. they must play a card of the same suit, if they have one. The player who c", "headingPath": "Playing a trick · Sequence of play · Once the round has ended:", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}, {"page": 12, "score": 0.047371, "snippet": "Late to the Ball. Before the first trick, after ex -changing cards, each player places a card from their hand face down in front of them. That card will be played in the last trick of the round, fol -lowing the normal rules. Poisoned Apple. During this round, when you're 'void', you win the trick wi", "headingPath": "Round cards", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}, {"page": 14, "score": 0.047163, "snippet": "Blind Man's Bluff. Every player divides their hand into two equal halves and sets one half aside face down. Play one half of the hand first, and then, give the other half to the player on your right so that they can play it. Midnight Makeover. Fairies act as a joker and can follow any suit. They can", "headingPath": "Round cards", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}, {"page": 7, "score": 0.046751, "snippet": "card of a different suit. This is called being 'void'. When all the players have played a card, check who has won the trick. The player with the highest card of the leading suit wins the trick, picks up all the cards in that trick and puts them, face down, in front of them. Won tricks cannot be cons", "headingPath": "Playing the game", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}, {"page": 13, "score": 0.044776, "snippet": "The Prince Always Rings Twice. When all the players have played their cards, the trick contin -ues and every player plays a second card, follow -ing the rules. To find out who wins the trick, add the value of the cards from the leading suit. In case of a tie, whoever has played the highest card of t", "headingPath": "Round cards", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}, {"page": 8, "score": 0.04311, "snippet": "Note: In your first game(s) , you may ignore the Princesses' powers in order to learn the basics of the game. At most once per round, a player can use their Princess's power if they wish (see 'Princess cards', p. 15). To do so, read it out loud and rotate your Princess card 90º until it is horizonta", "headingPath": "Using the power of a princess · Marriage proposals", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}, {"page": 5, "score": 0.03125, "snippet": "makes their choice will be the starting player. If you prefer, give the princesses out at random. In this case, the last per -son who attended a wedding will start the game. Organize the party. Choose 5 round cards (see 'Round cards', p. 10), and place them in a row in a visible place, face down. Yo", "headingPath": "Set-up", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}, {"page": 15, "score": 0.030366, "snippet": "Princess powers can be played once per round , when the Princess card is active (vertical). Rotate the Princess card 90º to show that you have used the power (she is considered 'ex -hausted'). Although the powers are described on each card, they are explained in more de -tail below. Cinderella: Ever", "headingPath": "Princess cards", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}]
- citations (raw) — what the answer cited, chosen from a retrieval this page cannot show
- [{"page": 4, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Set-up", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}, {"page": 5, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Set-up", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}, {"page": 6, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Playing a trick · Sequence of play · Once the round has ended:", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}, {"page": 7, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Playing the game", "sharpsignalDocId": 991}]
- boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3)
-
no registered errata card matched this query; base rulebook doc 991 boosted; rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true
base rulebook doc 991 boosted
- answered-before recall
-
this ruling was answered, so past rulings were not offered
similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)
- answer fence
- passed — letter density 0.90035 of 1726 non-space chars (floor 0.45); 0 glyph-index tokens (max 2)
- debug row recorded
- Sep 6, 2026 13:08 UTC
retrieval — what the passage search returned
what this block IS: the PASSAGE SEARCH's own results — the same search that fills this page's closest-passages list — and NOT the passages the answerer read. Answering runs its OWN retrieval: a far wider candidate pool, re-ranked down to a final handful, plus floors this search never applies — the base rulebook, surviving errata corrections, and one slot per book on a multi-book read. Each of those armed only if THIS ask sent what it needs: the boost block names the ids it forwarded, and the scope line names the books it read. A document the answer CITES that no row here names is therefore EXPECTED, not a defect: two searches, two candidate pools, two orders. The answerer's own final rows are shown in their own block below, beside these and never mixed into them.
score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. This ruling ran the THREE-ARM fuse (full-text + vector + the doc-priority boost arm, which carried the base rulebook and/or the errata corrections this query matched), whose arithmetic ceiling is 0.04918 — all three arms ranking the same chunk #1 (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60). The measured healthy band 0.016–0.033 was measured on TWO-arm asks and does not bound this one: its high end is the two-arm ceiling, and a third arm has room above it. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.
per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| fused rank | document | heading | page | fused RRF score | snippet chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Playing a trick · Sequence of play · Once the round has ended: | p.6 | 0.048916 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Round cards | p.12 | 0.047371 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Round cards | p.14 | 0.047163 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Playing the game | p.7 | 0.046751 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Round cards | p.13 | 0.044776 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #6 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Using the power of a princess · Marriage proposals | p.8 | 0.04311 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #7 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Set-up | p.5 | 0.03125 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #8 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Princess cards | p.15 | 0.030366 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
what the answerer read — the passages it actually had in front of it
what this block IS: the passages the ANSWERING read put in front of the answerer, in the order it read them — the other half of the two reads described above, and the one that decides what the answer could possibly say. Each row names the book it came from and where in that book it sits, what it scored when the search arms were fused, which arm carried it there, and whether the re-ranker chose it or a floor guaranteed it a slot. A row here that no passage-search row names is EXPECTED: a far wider pool, re-ranked, with floors the passage search never applies.
candidate pool: the answering read scored 19 passages, out of a ceiling of 80 set gateway-side. Both figures are reported by the gateway for THIS ask — measurements of what actually happened, not constants read out of anyone's source and printed here on faith.
floors armed for this ask: the base rulebook — armed · surviving errata corrections — not armed · one slot per book on a multi-book read — not armed. Every floor is stated on every ask, armed or not, so a floor that did not apply here is never mistaken for one this app does not know about.
arms fused for this ask: vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm. Stated separately from the rows because an arm that ran and carried nothing is a different fact from an arm that never ran.
| read at | document | heading | page | fused rank | fused RRF score | carried by | how it got its slot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Playing a trick · Sequence of play · Once the round has ended: | p.6 | #1 | 0.048916 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Set-up | p.5 | #7 | 0.03125 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Princess cards | p.16 | #10 | 0.029274 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text | the re-ranker chose it |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Playing the game | p.7 | #4 | 0.046751 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Set-up | p.4 | #9 | 0.030303 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #6 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Princess cards | p.15 | #8 | 0.030366 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text | the re-ranker chose it |
| #7 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Round cards | p.12 | #2 | 0.047371 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #8 | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Round cards | p.14 | #3 | 0.047163 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
chosen chunks — what the answer actually cited
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| # | document | heading | page | quote chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Set-up | p.4 | no quote on the wire |
| [2] | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Set-up | p.5 | no quote on the wire |
| [3] | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Playing a trick · Sequence of play · Once the round has ended: | p.6 | no quote on the wire |
| [4] | RULEBOOK Rebel Princess — Rulebook (corpus doc 991) | Playing the game | p.7 | no quote on the wire |
generation — timing and the path taken
- timing split
- retrieval 84 ms · first delta 1437 ms · total 4111 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
- full breakdown
- queued 0 ms · retrieval 84 ms · ask 4025 ms · gateway work 4111 ms · total 4111 ms
- tokens in (the prompt the answerer read)
- 2445
- tokens out (what the answerer generated)
- 530
- tok/sec
- 201.9 tok/sec — 530 output tokens in 2.625 s of generation
- live seat (read from the running child)
- answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 14s ago)
- answerer host (measured by rulesage)
- reachable (for 22h, checked 3s ago)
- answerer node (the seat proxy's own header — this probe, not this ask)
- node1
- stream path
- streamed — the gateway pushed at least one accumulated draft
- watchdog
- first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
- num_ctx · think posture
- both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.
disposition
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- abstain rationale (n/a — this ruling answered)
- answered — no abstain rationale applies
setup-shape — why the checklist band did or didn't render
- decision
- NOT_SETUP_SHAPED — no setup-shape pattern matched this question
errata registry — what the gate above had to match against
this game registers NO errata cards (edition 921), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one
Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.