You asked
How do I play?
Answered counted as answeredAsked with: Sabikabg-360265-en-1e
One rule clearer, zero feelings hurt.
🔧 debug — where this ruling came from
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- corpus profile
- live,vps
- answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only)
- gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70
- timings
- search 106 ms · ask 4818 ms · total 7342 ms
- single-flight (PR-5)
- queued 2416 ms · generation 4926 ms
- retrieval refs (raw) — what the PASSAGE SEARCH returned, not what the answerer read
- [{"page": 19, "score": 0.047938, "snippet": "Take on the automa Yusuf, another Nasrid nobleman who will compete against you for prestige and prominence in the history of the Kingdom of Granada. Setup a game as if for 2 players, with the following exceptions: Before placing the major Poems on the board, remove Card F1 from the game. Yusuf takes", "headingPath": "The events · Game setup · Main board setup · Each player · Finally: · How to play", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}, {"page": 9, "score": 0.047619, "snippet": "Outer Rondel: Focuses on the construction of the Alhambra. Each player has 2 Workers in this Rondel, called Master Builders. Middle Rondel: Focuses on the procurement and processing of Raw Materials for export as Goods to the Cities on the Map. Each player has 1 Worker in this Rondel, called a Merch", "headingPath": "Phase 1. Actions", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}, {"page": 16, "score": 0.045335, "snippet": "The Sultan's Wishes in the game are as follows: All players stand their workers back up, including those in their Workshop, thus restoring them to their active state. Then move all the Sultan's Workers 1 step clockwise (these Workers are always standing). In a 4-player game there are no Sultan's Wor", "headingPath": "The Sultan's Wishes · Reactivating workers · Maintenance · Starting player · Era change · End of game", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}, {"page": 19, "score": 0.044776, "snippet": "When it is his turn to play, Yusuf must reveal the top Worker Tile of his pile: this Tile will show which of his Workers to activate. Revealed Tiles remain face up until the End of Round, at which point the Draw Pile is reformed. Next, Yusuf reveals the top Card of the corresponding Worker Deck show", "headingPath": "Phase 1. Action · Movement · Special cases:", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}, {"page": 5, "score": 0.032258, "snippet": "Therefore, in a 4-player game there will be 5 Minor Poems available. K. Shuffle the Major Poem Cards and draw 2 for each player in the game (4/6/8 Major Poems for 2/3/4 players), keeping in mind that each Major Poem must have a different letter. If you draw a letter which you already have, discard i", "headingPath": "Main board setup", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}, {"page": 5, "score": 0.030769, "snippet": "E. Place the Narrator Token on the first space of the Round T rack. F. Shuffle the Sultan's Wishes Tiles face down, choose 3 Tiles, one Tile of each letter (A, B and C), and randomly place one Tile on each of the spaces of the Round Track outlined by the dotted lines. Remove the remaining Sultan's W", "headingPath": "Main board setup", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}, {"page": 5, "score": 0.030303, "snippet": "Each player must choose a colour and take: N. 1 Workshop, 4 Starting Storehouses (placed on the corresponding spaces of the Workshop) and one randomly selected Architectural Balance Card (placed above the Workshop). O. The 4 Workers of their colour: 2 Master Builders, 1 Merchant and 1 Poet which are", "headingPath": "Player setup · Overview and objective", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}, {"page": 9, "score": 0.030118, "snippet": "Complete the following steps in order: Move the chosen Worker, always in a clockwise direction , around its corresponding Rondel , ending its movement on a square. You may then carry out a Main and/or Secondary Action. In the case of the Outer Rondel, your 2 Master Builders can never occupy the same", "headingPath": "Work · Rest", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}]
- citations (raw) — what the answer cited, chosen from a retrieval this page cannot show
- [{"page": 8, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Prestige points · How to play · Phase 1. Actions", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}, {"page": 19, "quote": null, "headingPath": "The events · Game setup · Main board setup · Each player · Finally: · How to play", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}, {"page": 9, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Phase 1. Actions", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}, {"page": 9, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Work · Rest", "sharpsignalDocId": 1030}]
- boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3)
-
no registered errata card matched this query; base rulebook doc 1030 boosted; rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true
base rulebook doc 1030 boosted
- answered-before recall
-
this ruling was answered, so past rulings were not offered
similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)
- answer fence
- passed — letter density 0.89727 of 1392 non-space chars (floor 0.45); 0 glyph-index tokens (max 2)
- debug row recorded
- Sep 7, 2026 02:58 UTC
retrieval — what the passage search returned
what this block IS: the PASSAGE SEARCH's own results — the same search that fills this page's closest-passages list — and NOT the passages the answerer read. Answering runs its OWN retrieval: a far wider candidate pool, re-ranked down to a final handful, plus floors this search never applies — the base rulebook, surviving errata corrections, and one slot per book on a multi-book read. Each of those armed only if THIS ask sent what it needs: the boost block names the ids it forwarded, and the scope line names the books it read. A document the answer CITES that no row here names is therefore EXPECTED, not a defect: two searches, two candidate pools, two orders. The answerer's own final rows are shown in their own block below, beside these and never mixed into them.
score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. This ruling ran the THREE-ARM fuse (full-text + vector + the doc-priority boost arm, which carried the base rulebook and/or the errata corrections this query matched), whose arithmetic ceiling is 0.04918 — all three arms ranking the same chunk #1 (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60). The measured healthy band 0.016–0.033 was measured on TWO-arm asks and does not bound this one: its high end is the two-arm ceiling, and a third arm has room above it. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.
per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| fused rank | document | heading | page | fused RRF score | snippet chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | The events · Game setup · Main board setup · Each player · Finally: · How to play | p.19 | 0.047938 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Phase 1. Actions | p.9 | 0.047619 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | The Sultan's Wishes · Reactivating workers · Maintenance · Starting player · Era change · End of game | p.16 | 0.045335 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Phase 1. Action · Movement · Special cases: | p.19 | 0.044776 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Main board setup | p.5 | 0.032258 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #6 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Main board setup | p.5 | 0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #7 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Player setup · Overview and objective | p.5 | 0.030303 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #8 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Work · Rest | p.9 | 0.030118 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
what the answerer read — the passages it actually had in front of it
what this block IS: the passages the ANSWERING read put in front of the answerer, in the order it read them — the other half of the two reads described above, and the one that decides what the answer could possibly say. Each row names the book it came from and where in that book it sits, what it scored when the search arms were fused, which arm carried it there, and whether the re-ranker chose it or a floor guaranteed it a slot. A row here that no passage-search row names is EXPECTED: a far wider pool, re-ranked, with floors the passage search never applies.
candidate pool: the answering read scored 46 passages, out of a ceiling of 80 set gateway-side. Both figures are reported by the gateway for THIS ask — measurements of what actually happened, not constants read out of anyone's source and printed here on faith.
floors armed for this ask: the base rulebook — armed · surviving errata corrections — not armed · one slot per book on a multi-book read — not armed. Every floor is stated on every ask, armed or not, so a floor that did not apply here is never mistaken for one this app does not know about.
arms fused for this ask: vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm. Stated separately from the rows because an arm that ran and carried nothing is a different fact from an arm that never ran.
| read at | document | heading | page | fused rank | fused RRF score | carried by | how it got its slot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Rondel setup | p.5 | #9 | 0.029412 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | The events · Game setup · Main board setup · Each player · Finally: · How to play | p.19 | #1 | 0.047938 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Prestige points · How to play · Phase 1. Actions | p.8 | #12 | 0.028571 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text | the re-ranker chose it |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Main board setup | p.5 | #6 | 0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Phase 1. Actions | p.9 | #2 | 0.047619 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #6 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Videotutorials | p.24 | #13 | 0.028405 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text | the re-ranker chose it |
| #7 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Phase 1. Action · Movement · Special cases: | p.19 | #4 | 0.044776 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #8 | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Work · Rest | p.9 | #8 | 0.030118 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text | the re-ranker chose it |
chosen chunks — what the answer actually cited
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| # | document | heading | page | quote chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Prestige points · How to play · Phase 1. Actions | p.8 | no quote on the wire |
| [2] | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | The events · Game setup · Main board setup · Each player · Finally: · How to play | p.19 | no quote on the wire |
| [3] | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Phase 1. Actions | p.9 | no quote on the wire |
| [4] | RULEBOOK Sabika — Rulebook (corpus doc 1030) | Work · Rest | p.9 | no quote on the wire |
generation — timing and the path taken
- timing split
- retrieval 106 ms · first delta 2664 ms · total 7342 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
- full breakdown
- queued 2416 ms · retrieval 106 ms · ask 4818 ms · gateway work 4926 ms · total 7342 ms
- tokens in (the prompt the answerer read)
- 3077
- tokens out (what the answerer generated)
- 442
- tok/sec
- 201.2 tok/sec — 442 output tokens in 2.197 s of generation
- live seat (read from the running child)
- answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 49s ago)
- answerer host (measured by rulesage)
- reachable (for 22h, checked 0s ago)
- answerer node (the seat proxy's own header — this probe, not this ask)
- node1
- stream path
- streamed — the gateway pushed at least one accumulated draft
- watchdog
- first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
- num_ctx · think posture
- both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.
disposition
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- abstain rationale (n/a — this ruling answered)
- answered — no abstain rationale applies
setup-shape — why the checklist band did or didn't render
- decision
- NOT_SETUP_SHAPED — no setup-shape pattern matched this question
errata registry — what the gate above had to match against
this game registers NO errata cards (edition 960), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one
Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.