You asked
How do I play?
Answered counted as answeredAsked with: Pixiesbg-411875-en-1e
The book has spoken.
🔧 debug — where this ruling came from
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- corpus profile
- live,vps
- answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only)
- gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70
- timings
- search 175 ms · ask 15213 ms · total 90845 ms
- single-flight (PR-5)
- queued 75453 ms · generation 15392 ms
- retrieval refs (raw) — what the PASSAGE SEARCH returned, not what the answerer read
- [{"page": 1, "score": 0.04918, "snippet": "PIXIE 70 cards, 1 rulebook. 07/12/2023 16:03:07 07/1 03:07 PIXIES_cards.indd 48 PIXIES_c .indd 48 Front 07/12/2023 16:03:15 6:03:15 07/12/2 dd 20 PIXIES_cards.indd 20 PIXIES_cards.indd 1 11/12/2023 14:57:32 Back Shuffle the cards into a deck, placed facedown. Choose the first player at random. The p", "headingPath": "COMPONENTS · GAME SETUP · GAME OBJECTIVE · GAME TURNS", "sharpsignalDocId": 1096}, {"page": 1, "score": 0.048131, "snippet": "Each player's playing area consists of 9 spaces. If possible, you must put the card in the space matching its number, but cards already in play may affect where and how you play the card. There are 3 possible scenarios: Case 1. The player does not have a faceup card with this number. They must place", "headingPath": "CARD PLACEMENT RULES", "sharpsignalDocId": 1096}, {"page": 1, "score": 0.047379, "snippet": "The end of the round is triggered when, at the end of any turn (after all players have placed a card), a player has filled all 9 of their spaces, regardless of whether the cards are faceup or facedown. The points are then counted, and the score of each player is noted. In a 2-player game, the round ", "headingPath": "END OF THE ROUND · SCORING · Validated cards · Symbols · The player's largest color zone · PIXIES_cards.indd 14 PIXIES_cards.indd 46 07/12/2023 16:03:15 Points for validated cards · …", "sharpsignalDocId": 1096}, {"page": 1, "score": 0.047371, "snippet": "4 connected blue cards ( 1 , 2 , 3 and 4 ) x 2 points for round 1 = 8 points A total of 40 points for this player's first round! A multi-colored card has all the colors at the same time. This means that it counts for the player's color zone of course, but also for all t h e i r special cards as well", "headingPath": "Points for the largest color zone · PREPARATION FOR THE NEXT ROUND · END OF THE GAME · Example of Counting Score · NOTING YOUR SCORE · COLORADD · …", "sharpsignalDocId": 1096}, {"page": 1, "score": 0.030769, "snippet": "The player already has a faceup card with this number and it is already validated. They must place their card facedown on any empty space , regardless of its number. Note: This card cannot be placed under another card to validate it. It can be covered later with a card bearing the number of that spa", "headingPath": "CARD PLACEMENT RULES", "sharpsignalDocId": 1096}]
- citations (raw) — what the answer cited, chosen from a retrieval this page cannot show
- [{"page": 1, "quote": null, "headingPath": "COMPONENTS · GAME SETUP · GAME OBJECTIVE · GAME TURNS", "sharpsignalDocId": 1096}, {"page": 1, "quote": null, "headingPath": "CARD PLACEMENT RULES", "sharpsignalDocId": 1096}, {"page": 1, "quote": null, "headingPath": "CARD PLACEMENT RULES", "sharpsignalDocId": 1096}, {"page": 1, "quote": null, "headingPath": "END OF THE ROUND · SCORING · Validated cards · Symbols · The player's largest color zone · PIXIES_cards.indd 14 PIXIES_cards.indd 46 07/12/2023 16:03:15 Points for validated cards · …", "sharpsignalDocId": 1096}, {"page": 1, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Points for the largest color zone · PREPARATION FOR THE NEXT ROUND · END OF THE GAME · Example of Counting Score · NOTING YOUR SCORE · COLORADD · …", "sharpsignalDocId": 1096}]
- boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3)
-
no registered errata card matched this query; base rulebook doc 1096 boosted; rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true
base rulebook doc 1096 boosted
- answered-before recall
-
this ruling was answered, so past rulings were not offered
similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)
- answer fence
- passed — letter density 0.88559 of 2325 non-space chars (floor 0.45); 0 glyph-index tokens (max 2)
- debug row recorded
- Sep 7, 2026 03:02 UTC
retrieval — what the passage search returned
what this block IS: the PASSAGE SEARCH's own results — the same search that fills this page's closest-passages list — and NOT the passages the answerer read. Answering runs its OWN retrieval: a far wider candidate pool, re-ranked down to a final handful, plus floors this search never applies — the base rulebook, surviving errata corrections, and one slot per book on a multi-book read. Each of those armed only if THIS ask sent what it needs: the boost block names the ids it forwarded, and the scope line names the books it read. A document the answer CITES that no row here names is therefore EXPECTED, not a defect: two searches, two candidate pools, two orders. The answerer's own final rows are shown in their own block below, beside these and never mixed into them.
score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. This ruling ran the THREE-ARM fuse (full-text + vector + the doc-priority boost arm, which carried the base rulebook and/or the errata corrections this query matched), whose arithmetic ceiling is 0.04918 — all three arms ranking the same chunk #1 (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60). The measured healthy band 0.016–0.033 was measured on TWO-arm asks and does not bound this one: its high end is the two-arm ceiling, and a third arm has room above it. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.
per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| fused rank | document | heading | page | fused RRF score | snippet chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | COMPONENTS · GAME SETUP · GAME OBJECTIVE · GAME TURNS | p.1 | 0.04918 (at the 3-arm ceiling (0.04918) — every arm ranked it #1) | 300 |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | CARD PLACEMENT RULES | p.1 | 0.048131 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | END OF THE ROUND · SCORING · Validated cards · Symbols · The player's largest color zone · PIXIES_cards.indd 14 PIXIES_cards.indd 46 07/12/2023 16:03:15 Points for validated cards · … | p.1 | 0.047379 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | Points for the largest color zone · PREPARATION FOR THE NEXT ROUND · END OF THE GAME · Example of Counting Score · NOTING YOUR SCORE · COLORADD · … | p.1 | 0.047371 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | CARD PLACEMENT RULES | p.1 | 0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | 300 |
what the answerer read — the passages it actually had in front of it
what this block IS: the passages the ANSWERING read put in front of the answerer, in the order it read them — the other half of the two reads described above, and the one that decides what the answer could possibly say. Each row names the book it came from and where in that book it sits, what it scored when the search arms were fused, which arm carried it there, and whether the re-ranker chose it or a floor guaranteed it a slot. A row here that no passage-search row names is EXPECTED: a far wider pool, re-ranked, with floors the passage search never applies.
candidate pool: the answering read scored 5 passages, out of a ceiling of 80 set gateway-side. Both figures are reported by the gateway for THIS ask — measurements of what actually happened, not constants read out of anyone's source and printed here on faith.
floors armed for this ask: the base rulebook — armed · surviving errata corrections — not armed · one slot per book on a multi-book read — not armed. Every floor is stated on every ask, armed or not, so a floor that did not apply here is never mistaken for one this app does not know about.
arms fused for this ask: vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm. Stated separately from the rows because an arm that ran and carried nothing is a different fact from an arm that never ran.
| read at | document | heading | page | fused rank | fused RRF score | carried by | how it got its slot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | CARD PLACEMENT RULES | p.1 | #2 | 0.048131 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #2 | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | COMPONENTS · GAME SETUP · GAME OBJECTIVE · GAME TURNS | p.1 | #1 | 0.04918 (at the 3-arm ceiling (0.04918) — every arm ranked it #1) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #3 | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | CARD PLACEMENT RULES | p.1 | #5 | 0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #4 | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | END OF THE ROUND · SCORING · Validated cards · Symbols · The player's largest color zone · PIXIES_cards.indd 14 PIXIES_cards.indd 46 07/12/2023 16:03:15 Points for validated cards · … | p.1 | #3 | 0.047379 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
| #5 | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | Points for the largest color zone · PREPARATION FOR THE NEXT ROUND · END OF THE GAME · Example of Counting Score · NOTING YOUR SCORE · COLORADD · … | p.1 | #4 | 0.047371 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) | vector + full-text + the doc-priority boost arm | the re-ranker chose it |
chosen chunks — what the answer actually cited
token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.
| # | document | heading | page | quote chars |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [1] | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | COMPONENTS · GAME SETUP · GAME OBJECTIVE · GAME TURNS | p.1 | no quote on the wire |
| [2] | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | CARD PLACEMENT RULES | p.1 | no quote on the wire |
| [3] | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | CARD PLACEMENT RULES | p.1 | no quote on the wire |
| [4] | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | END OF THE ROUND · SCORING · Validated cards · Symbols · The player's largest color zone · PIXIES_cards.indd 14 PIXIES_cards.indd 46 07/12/2023 16:03:15 Points for validated cards · … | p.1 | no quote on the wire |
| [5] | RULEBOOK Pixies — Rulebook (corpus doc 1096) | Points for the largest color zone · PREPARATION FOR THE NEXT ROUND · END OF THE GAME · Example of Counting Score · NOTING YOUR SCORE · COLORADD · … | p.1 | no quote on the wire |
generation — timing and the path taken
- timing split
- retrieval 175 ms · first delta 1617 ms · total 90845 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
- full breakdown
- queued 75453 ms · retrieval 175 ms · ask 15213 ms · gateway work 15392 ms · total 90845 ms
- tokens in (the prompt the answerer read)
- 2813
- tokens out (what the answerer generated)
- 751
- tok/sec
- 55.0 tok/sec — 751 output tokens in 13.649 s of generation
- live seat (read from the running child)
- answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 25s ago)
- answerer host (measured by rulesage)
- reachable (for 22h, checked 4s ago)
- answerer node (the seat proxy's own header — this probe, not this ask)
- node1
- stream path
- streamed — the gateway pushed at least one accumulated draft
- watchdog
- first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
- num_ctx · think posture
- both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.
disposition
- outcome
- ANSWERED — Answered
- abstain rationale (n/a — this ruling answered)
- answered — no abstain rationale applies
setup-shape — why the checklist band did or didn't render
- decision
- NOT_SETUP_SHAPED — no setup-shape pattern matched this question
errata registry — what the gate above had to match against
this game registers NO errata cards (edition 1026), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one
Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.