RuleSage cited table rulings
← Codenames

You asked

How do I setup the game?

Refused — this game's rulebook isn't loaded yet counted as app error

Answered before

This question didn't get an answer just now — but Codenames has been asked something like it before. The corpus may have changed since, so check the date and the answerer on each one before you rule from it.

How do I setup the game?

Answered Aug 2, 2026 gemma4:26b

How do I set up the game?

Answered Aug 8, 2026 gemma4:26b read Codenames

How do I set up the game?

Answered Aug 2, 2026 gemma4:26b

This game's rulebook isn't loaded yet.

The corpus group bg-178900-en-1e exists but has no searchable documents yet — the rulebook is still being ingested. This is not a gap in the rules; there is simply nothing to search yet.

🔧 debug — where this ruling came from
outcome
REFUSED_EMPTY_GROUP — Refused — this game's rulebook isn't loaded yet
corpus profile
live
answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only)
gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70
timings
search null ms · ask null ms · total 6 ms
single-flight (PR-5)
queued 0 ms · generation 6 ms
retrieval refs (raw)
citations (raw)
boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3)
no registered errata card matched this query; base-rulebook boost: not recorded (this ruling predates it); rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true
base-rulebook boost: not recorded (this ruling predates it)
answered-before recall
past answered rulings were found and offered
similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)
  • ruling 775 — matched by the same question (normalized, punctuation folded) — measured similarity 1.0
  • ruling 2099 — matched by trigram similarity — measured similarity 0.8148
  • ruling 896 — matched by trigram similarity — measured similarity 0.8148
error detail
CorpusGroupNotLaunched: search_documents refused: Error executing tool search_documents: group 'bg-178900-en-1e' is not one of this MCP principal's launch groups ['bg-11-en-1e', 'bg-13-en-1e', 'bg-13-en-1e-strategy', 'bg-148228-en-1e', 'bg-162886-en-1e', 'bg-162886-en-1e-strategy', 'bg-164928-en-1e', 'bg-167791-en-1e', 'bg-167791-en-1e-strategy', 'bg-169786-en-1e', 'bg-183394-en-1e', 'bg-199792-en-1e', 'bg-199792-en-1e-strategy', 'bg-209418-en-1e', 'bg-224517-en-1e', 'bg-225694-en-1e', 'bg-230802-en-1e', 'bg-237182-en-1e', 'bg-237182-en-1e-strategy', 'bg-256226-en-1e', 'bg-2651-en-1e', 'bg-266192-en-1e', 'bg-266192-en-1e-strategy', 'bg-281259-en-1e', 'bg-283355-en-1e', 'bg-28720-en-1e', 'bg-287954-en-1e', 'bg-291457-en-1e', 'bg-291457-en-1e-strategy', 'bg-295947-en-1e', 'bg-316377-en-2e', 'bg-316377-en-2e-strategy', 'bg-316554-en-1e', 'bg-342942-en-1e', 'bg-360226-en-1e', 'bg-36218-en-1e', 'bg-410201-en-1e', 'bg-414317-en-1e', 'bg-428440-en-1e', 'bg-436126-en-1e', 'bg-436126-en-1e-strategy', 'bg-5-en-1e', 'bg-50-en-1e', 'bg-9209-en-1e'] — refusing (D-1 narrows, it never widens)
debug row retained until
Oct 31, 2026 03:47

score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. How many arms fused this ruling was NOT RECORDED (it predates the boost trail, ran on the path that stored none, or stored one that could not be read), and the ceiling depends on that count (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60): 2 arms top out at 0.03279; 3 arms top out at 0.04918. So a score above 0.03279 here is not an anomaly: it is arithmetic proof a boost arm voted, and the measured band 0.016–0.033 (taken on two-arm asks) is what does not apply. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.

per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.

token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.

no payload was recorded for this ruling (the call never returned one)

token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.

no payload was recorded for this ruling (the call never returned one)

timing split
retrieval n/a · first delta n/a · total 6 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
full breakdown
queued 0 ms · retrieval n/a ms · ask n/a ms · gateway work 6 ms · total 6 ms
live seat (read from the running child)
answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 23s ago)
stream path
not recorded — this ruling predates the stream-path column (V41)
watchdog
first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
num_ctx · think posture
both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.
outcome
REFUSED_EMPTY_GROUP — Refused — this game's rulebook isn't loaded yet
abstain rationale
the answerer offered no rationale text with this refusal (or the ruling predates the abstain_rationale column, V41)
decision
NO_APPROVED_CHECKLIST — setup-shaped, but no approved setup checklist exists for this game
pattern that matched
SETUP — "setup" / "set up"
matched words (in the normalized question)
setup

this game registers NO errata cards (edition 39), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one

Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.