Ruling — Lords of Waterdeep

You asked

How many workers do I get with 5 players?

Answered counted as answered

Asked with: Lords of Waterdeepbg-110327-en-1e

With 5 players, you get 2 Agents per player [1][2].

[1] RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook · p.13 · seTup · seQuenCe of play · Rules RefeRenCe · aCTions in a TuRn

[2] RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook · p.3 · Game ComponenTs · How To win · seTup · Game boaRd · aGenTs · sCoRe maRkeRs

🔧 debug — where this ruling came from

outcome: ANSWERED — Answered
corpus profile: live
answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only): gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70
timings: search 244 ms · ask 5573 ms · total 5828 ms
single-flight (PR-5): queued 0 ms · generation 5828 ms
retrieval refs (raw): [{"page": 13, "score": 0.032787, "snippet": "Lay out the game board. Each player chooses a color and takes a number of that color's Agents that depends on the number of players. | Number of Players | Agents per Player | | 2 | 4 | | 3 | 3 | | 4 | 2 | | 5 | 2 | Each player also places 1 more Agent of his or her color near the Round 5 space of th", "headingPath": "seTup · seQuenCe of play · Rules RefeRenCe · aCTions in a TuRn", "sharpsignalDocId": 127}, {"page": 5, "score": 0.032258, "snippet": "8 The Lords of Waterdeep game is played in rounds . During each round, players take turns in which they assign their Agents to various tasks. The game ends after 8 rounds have passed. The player with the most VP at the end of the eighth round is the winner. The rounds track on the game board starts ", "headingPath": "sTaRT play · seQuenCe of play · sTaRT of Round · aCTions in a TuRn", "sharpsignalDocId": 127}, {"page": 13, "score": 0.031746, "snippet": "Assign Agent: Place 1 Agent from your pool on an unoccupied action space of a Building. You cannot skip your turn if you have Agents available to assign. If you have no Agents left to assign, you cannot take a turn. Play proceeds to the next player until all Agents have been assigned. Reassign Agent", "headingPath": "2. Complete Quest · final sCoRinG", "sharpsignalDocId": 127}, {"page": 4, "score": 0.03125, "snippet": "6 Your Agents hire various Adventurers , whether noble heroes or mere mercenaries, to accomplish various tasks. There are four kinds of Adventurers, represented by wooden cubes: Clerics (white), Fighters (orange), Rogues (black), and Wizards (purple). Different Quests require different kinds of Adve", "headingPath": "playeR maTs · adVenTuReRs · oTHeR pieCes · buildinG ConTRol maRkeRs · Gold · ViCToRy poinTs · …", "sharpsignalDocId": 127}, {"page": 3, "score": 0.030769, "snippet": "Each player takes a player mat that matches his or her Agents' color. This helps keep track of various game resources. Agent Pool: Here is where you keep Agents that you have not yet assigned (see 'Assign Agent' on page 8). At the end of the round, all of your assigned Agents return to your pool. Ta", "headingPath": "playeR maTs", "sharpsignalDocId": 127}, {"page": 5, "score": 0.030303, "snippet": "If you have any Agents in your pool, you assign 1 of them. To assign an Agent, place it on any unoccupied action space of a Building, whether a basic Building or one that has been put into play. You cannot place an Agent on an action space that contains another Agent (yours or another player's) or o", "headingPath": "assiGn aGenT · buildeR's Hall", "sharpsignalDocId": 127}, {"page": 3, "score": 0.029851, "snippet": "4 The Lords of Waterdeep ™ game is played in eight rounds . The player with the most Victory Points at the end of the final round is the winner. Before you can start playing, you'll need to spend a bit of time setting up the game. The game board represents the various Wards of the city of Waterdeep.", "headingPath": "Game ComponenTs · How To win · seTup · Game boaRd · aGenTs · sCoRe maRkeRs", "sharpsignalDocId": 127}, {"page": 6, "score": 0.029412, "snippet": "A few Quests have the notation 'Plot Quest,' which indicates that they are especially important to successfully managing Waterdeep. Plot Quests have ongoing effects in addition to providing rewards. For example, Recover the Magister's Orb has a one-time reward of 6 VP . However, it also grants an on", "headingPath": "ploT QuesTs · end of Round · endinG THe Game · final sCoRinG", "sharpsignalDocId": 127}]
citations (raw): [{"page": 13, "quote": null, "headingPath": "seTup · seQuenCe of play · Rules RefeRenCe · aCTions in a TuRn", "sharpsignalDocId": 127}, {"page": 3, "quote": null, "headingPath": "Game ComponenTs · How To win · seTup · Game boaRd · aGenTs · sCoRe maRkeRs", "sharpsignalDocId": 127}]
boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3): no registered errata card matched this query; base rulebook doc 127 boosted; rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true
base rulebook doc 127 boosted
answered-before recall: this ruling was answered, so past rulings were not offered
similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)
debug row retained until: Nov 2, 2026 08:53

retrieval — what the search arm returned

score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. This ruling ran the THREE-ARM fuse (full-text + vector + the doc-priority boost arm, which carried the base rulebook and/or the errata corrections this query matched), whose arithmetic ceiling is 0.04918 — all three arms ranking the same chunk #1 (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60). The measured healthy band 0.016–0.033 was measured on TWO-arm asks and does not bound this one: its high end is the two-arm ceiling, and a third arm has room above it. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.

per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.

token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.

fused rank	document	heading	page	fused RRF score	snippet chars
#1	RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook (corpus doc 127)	seTup · seQuenCe of play · Rules RefeRenCe · aCTions in a TuRn	p.13	0.032787 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#2	RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook (corpus doc 127)	sTaRT play · seQuenCe of play · sTaRT of Round · aCTions in a TuRn	p.5	0.032258 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#3	RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook (corpus doc 127)	2. Complete Quest · final sCoRinG	p.13	0.031746 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#4	RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook (corpus doc 127)	playeR maTs · adVenTuReRs · oTHeR pieCes · buildinG ConTRol maRkeRs · Gold · ViCToRy poinTs · …	p.4	0.03125 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#5	RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook (corpus doc 127)	playeR maTs	p.3	0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#6	RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook (corpus doc 127)	assiGn aGenT · buildeR's Hall	p.5	0.030303 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#7	RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook (corpus doc 127)	Game ComponenTs · How To win · seTup · Game boaRd · aGenTs · sCoRe maRkeRs	p.3	0.029851 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300
#8	RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook (corpus doc 127)	ploT QuesTs · end of Round · endinG THe Game · final sCoRinG	p.6	0.029412 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one))	300

chosen chunks — what the answer actually cited

#	document	heading	page	quote chars
[1]	RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook (corpus doc 127)	seTup · seQuenCe of play · Rules RefeRenCe · aCTions in a TuRn	p.13	no quote on the wire
[2]	RULEBOOK Lords of Waterdeep — Rulebook (corpus doc 127)	Game ComponenTs · How To win · seTup · Game boaRd · aGenTs · sCoRe maRkeRs	p.3	no quote on the wire

generation — timing and the path taken

timing split: retrieval 244 ms · first delta 5659 ms · total 5828 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
full breakdown: queued 0 ms · retrieval 244 ms · ask 5573 ms · gateway work 5828 ms · total 5828 ms
tokens in (the prompt the answerer read): 3828
tokens out (what the answerer generated): 19
tok/sec: 141.8 tok/sec — 19 output tokens in 0.134 s of generation
live seat (read from the running child): answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 24s ago)
stream path: streamed — the gateway pushed at least one accumulated draft
watchdog: first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
num_ctx · think posture: both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.

disposition

outcome: ANSWERED — Answered
abstain rationale (n/a — this ruling answered): answered — no abstain rationale applies

setup-shape — why the checklist band did or didn't render

decision: NOT_SETUP_SHAPED — no setup-shape pattern matched this question

errata registry — what the gate above had to match against

this game registers NO errata cards (edition 49), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one

Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.