RuleSage cited table rulings
← Concordia Venus

You asked

How do I set up the game?

Abstained — no grounded answer; closest passages below counted as honest abstain

Asked with: Concordia Venusbg-256916-en-1e

The answerer couldn't ground a confident answer in the rulebook. The closest rulebook passages are below — check them before ruling.

RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook · p.1 · GAME MATERIAL · INDIVIDUAL OR TEAM PLAY · Game setup · Game flow · Individual Play for 2-5 players · GAME OVERVIEW · …
2 game boards with 4 scenarios: Hellas Imperium 1 card display (2 puzzle pieces) Ionium 6 storehouses Cyprus 1 Praefectus Magnus/Pantheon Concordia Venus offers two different variants: The Individual Play for 2 to 5 players, and the Team Play for 4 or 6 players (in 2 or 3 teams). Most game rules app
RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook · p.4 ·
Before that happens, the player may inspect their partner‘s hand of cards, and silently suggest a certain card by putting it in front when returning the cards. Of course, the partner is always free to follow that suggestion or not. The partner plays a personality card, and that personality card fina
RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook · p.2 · Scoring victory points · 2. 1 new colonist · 2. Build houses (after all movements)
The player recovers all of their previously played cards back into his hand. If the player takes back more than 3 cards (including the Tribune in the count), they receive 1 sestertius per card past the 3rd from the bank. In addition the player may optionally purchase 1 new colonist by paying 1 food
RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook · p.5 · Card Display · Game board IONIUM · Teams · Turns · Turn Order Marker · Stockpile and Sestertii · …
The boards of IONIUM and CYPRUS do not contain a card display area. Instead, the separate cardboard display is used and placed next to the game board. On its reverse side there is a variant with different additional costs, which is generally usable with all game boards of CONCORDIA. When applied, th
RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook · p.5 · PRÆFECTUS MAGNUS · Storehouse · Prefect / Architect - Architect / Mercator - Prefect / Mercator · FURTHER RULES · Trade and Stockpile · Pantheon
If a player who currently owns the PRÆFECTUS M. plays a Prefect card (or uses one with the Diplomat) in order to let a province produce, they receive a double bonus (2 units instead of 1). Production inside the cities is not affected. After their turn they hand the PRÆFECTUS M. to the player sitting
🔧 debug — where this ruling came from
outcome
ABSTAINED — Abstained — no grounded answer; closest passages below
corpus profile
live
answerer pin (deploy-frozen, attribution only)
gemma4:26b think:false 5571076f3d70
timings
search 280 ms · ask 4912 ms · total 1173364 ms
single-flight (PR-5)
queued 1168160 ms · generation 5204 ms
retrieval refs (raw)
[{"page": 1, "score": 0.048652, "snippet": "2 game boards with 4 scenarios: Hellas Imperium 1 card display (2 puzzle pieces) Ionium 6 storehouses Cyprus 1 Praefectus Magnus/Pantheon Concordia Venus offers two different variants: The Individual Play for 2 to 5 players, and the Team Play for 4 or 6 players (in 2 or 3 teams). Most game rules app", "headingPath": "GAME MATERIAL · INDIVIDUAL OR TEAM PLAY · Game setup · Game flow · Individual Play for 2-5 players · GAME OVERVIEW · …", "sharpsignalDocId": 294}, {"page": 4, "score": 0.032787, "snippet": "Before that happens, the player may inspect their partner‘s hand of cards, and silently suggest a certain card by putting it in front when returning the cards. Of course, the partner is always free to follow that suggestion or not. The partner plays a personality card, and that personality card fina", "headingPath": "", "sharpsignalDocId": 294}, {"page": 2, "score": 0.031746, "snippet": "The player recovers all of their previously played cards back into his hand. If the player takes back more than 3 cards (including the Tribune in the count), they receive 1 sestertius per card past the 3rd from the bank. In addition the player may optionally purchase 1 new colonist by paying 1 food ", "headingPath": "Scoring victory points · 2. 1 new colonist · 2. Build houses (after all movements)", "sharpsignalDocId": 294}, {"page": 5, "score": 0.03125, "snippet": "The boards of IONIUM and CYPRUS do not contain a card display area. Instead, the separate cardboard display is used and placed next to the game board. On its reverse side there is a variant with different additional costs, which is generally usable with all game boards of CONCORDIA. When applied, th", "headingPath": "Card Display · Game board IONIUM · Teams · Turns · Turn Order Marker · Stockpile and Sestertii · …", "sharpsignalDocId": 294}, {"page": 5, "score": 0.030769, "snippet": "If a player who currently owns the PRÆFECTUS M. plays a Prefect card (or uses one with the Diplomat) in order to let a province produce, they receive a double bonus (2 units instead of 1). Production inside the cities is not affected. After their turn they hand the PRÆFECTUS M. to the player sitting", "headingPath": "PRÆFECTUS MAGNUS · Storehouse · Prefect / Architect - Architect / Mercator - Prefect / Mercator · FURTHER RULES · Trade and Stockpile · Pantheon", "sharpsignalDocId": 294}, {"page": 3, "score": 0.030303, "snippet": "The player chooses between two alternatives: The player may place new colonists on the game board, each of which cost 1 food and 1 tool. New colonists can be placed inside the capital city or inside any other city where the player owns a house. or The player receives 5 sestertii plus 1 sestertius fo", "headingPath": "colonist · sPeciAlists", "sharpsignalDocId": 294}, {"page": 6, "score": 0.029851, "snippet": "If a player plays their Tribune card for the first time in the game in order to take their cards back into their hand, they immediately perform a personal intermediate scoring. They score all their cards as described below for the final scoring, and tallies their VP on the VP-track. After all player", "headingPath": "INTERMEDIATE SCORING · GAME END · FINAL SCORING · VESTA · JUPITER", "sharpsignalDocId": 294}, {"page": 2, "score": 0.029412, "snippet": "The player chooses between two alternatives: The player chooses a province where the houses produce goods . They can only choose an active province whose bonus marker (province tile) still shows the goods symbol. It is not necessary that the player (or any other player) owns a house in the chosen pr", "headingPath": "Prefect", "sharpsignalDocId": 294}]
citations (raw)
[]
boost provenance — errata + base rulebook (E2/E3)
no registered errata card matched this query; base rulebook doc 294 boosted; rulesage.errata.boost-enabled=true, rulesage.errata.supersedence-enabled=true
base rulebook doc 294 boosted
answered-before recall
no past answered ruling for this game matched closely enough
similarity threshold in force: 0.55 (rulesage.answered-before.similarity-threshold; the exact-question tier is not gated by it)
debug row retained until
Nov 6, 2026 14:28

score = the fused retrieval score (reciprocal-rank fusion over the search arms) — NOT a cosine similarity. This ruling ran the THREE-ARM fuse (full-text + vector + the doc-priority boost arm, which carried the base rulebook and/or the errata corrections this query matched), whose arithmetic ceiling is 0.04918 — all three arms ranking the same chunk #1 (ceiling = arms/(k+1) at k=60). The measured healthy band 0.016–0.033 was measured on TWO-arm asks and does not bound this one: its high end is the two-arm ceiling, and a third arm has room above it. A chunk only one arm ranked highly lands near 0.016 (that one arm's #1 vote), so 0.03 here is an excellent hit, not a 3% match.

per-arm ranks (the rank each search arm gave a chunk): NOT DISCLOSED by the gateway. Fusion happens gateway-side and only the FUSED score crosses the wire, so rulesage cannot show them without a gateway change. The rank column below is the FUSED rank (position in the returned list), which is real.

token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.

fused rankdocumentheadingpage fused RRF scoresnippet chars
#1 RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook (corpus doc 294) GAME MATERIAL · INDIVIDUAL OR TEAM PLAY · Game setup · Game flow · Individual Play for 2-5 players · GAME OVERVIEW · … p.1 0.048652 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) 300
#2 RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook (corpus doc 294) p.4 0.032787 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) 300
#3 RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook (corpus doc 294) Scoring victory points · 2. 1 new colonist · 2. Build houses (after all movements) p.2 0.031746 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) 300
#4 RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook (corpus doc 294) Card Display · Game board IONIUM · Teams · Turns · Turn Order Marker · Stockpile and Sestertii · … p.5 0.03125 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) 300
#5 RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook (corpus doc 294) PRÆFECTUS MAGNUS · Storehouse · Prefect / Architect - Architect / Mercator - Prefect / Mercator · FURTHER RULES · Trade and Stockpile · Pantheon p.5 0.030769 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) 300
#6 RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook (corpus doc 294) colonist · sPeciAlists p.3 0.030303 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) 300
#7 RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook (corpus doc 294) INTERMEDIATE SCORING · GAME END · FINAL SCORING · VESTA · JUPITER p.6 0.029851 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) 300
#8 RULEBOOK Concordia Venus — Rulebook (corpus doc 294) Prefect p.2 0.029412 (healthy, below this ruling's 3-arm ceiling 0.04918 (the measured band 0.016–0.033 was taken on two-arm asks and does not bound a 3-arm one)) 300

token count per chunk: NOT DISCLOSED — chunk token counts are not reported on the ask path. The character counts below are of the bounded snippet/quote rulesage actually received — a real measurement of what we hold, never an estimate of the chunk.

#documentheadingpagequote chars
timing split
retrieval 280 ms · first delta 5077 ms · total 1173364 ms (retrieval and first-delta both measured from the START of gateway work, so first-delta INCLUDES retrieval — do not subtract)
full breakdown
queued 1168160 ms · retrieval 280 ms · ask 4912 ms · gateway work 5204 ms · total 1173364 ms
tokens in (the prompt the answerer read)
4633
tokens out (what the answerer generated)
9
tok/sec
140.6 tok/sec — 9 output tokens in 0.064 s of generation
live seat (read from the running child)
answering — gemma4:26b think:false · num_ctx 32768 (live-verified 34s ago)
stream path
streamed — the gateway pushed at least one accumulated draft
watchdog
first-token watchdog: 30s per arming window (rulesage.table.first-token-watchdog-seconds), re-armed once by the passages frame — so the worst case before a reader falls back to polling is 60s. Whether it actually fired is a BROWSER-side decision that never reaches the server, so it is not recorded here. The stream path above is the server's half of that story: whether a delta was emitted at all.
num_ctx · think posture
both are the CHILD's settings, not rulesage's, and no ask reply carries them — an answer never states which context window or think posture produced it. The live-seat line above reads them from the running child instead, where the gateway can answer for itself; it describes the child NOW, not this ask.
outcome
ABSTAINED — Abstained — no grounded answer; closest passages below
abstain rationale
I don't have enough information.
the answerer's own words, verbatim — hostile corpus/LLM text, rendered escaped
decision
NO_APPROVED_CHECKLIST — setup-shaped, but no approved setup checklist exists for this game
pattern that matched
SETUP — "setup" / "set up"
matched words (in the normalized question)
set up

this game registers NO errata cards (edition 222), so "no registered errata card matched" above could never have matched one

Errata scope: the gate above matched this ruling's own edition only. When an ask also reads an expansion, that expansion's own registered errata cards stay outside the match — a stated phase-1 limitation, not a failed lookup.